Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Implement Bed Rail Use According to Assessment and Policy

Boston, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that side rails were implemented according to the resident assessment for one resident out of a sample of 24. The facility's policy requires that bed rails be used only after evaluation, care planning, and informed consent, with the least restrictive device chosen. For the resident in question, who was admitted with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and an anoxic brain injury and assessed as having severe cognitive impairment, observations showed that four side rails were consistently in use on the bed, despite the assessment indicating only two upper side rails should be used. Multiple observations over several days confirmed the use of all four side rails, regardless of the resident's activity or position in bed. Review of the resident's side rail assessments, care plan, and physician orders revealed that only two upper side rails were indicated, and there was no documentation supporting the use of four side rails. Interviews with nursing staff and a CNA indicated a lack of awareness regarding the correct number of side rails to be used, with staff attributing the use of four side rails to the family having purchased the bed. The DON confirmed that only two side rails should be in use according to the assessment and that a physician's order and care plan should be in place for side rail use, which were absent.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙