Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Resident Behaviors, Discharge Status, and Pressure Ulcer Staging

Boston, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the assessment and documentation of resident conditions and behaviors. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of pacing and wandering, the MDS assessment did not reflect the documented and observed behaviors of intrusive wandering and pacing, despite consistent documentation of these behaviors in the medical record and observations by staff. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these behaviors should have been coded on the MDS if they were occurring during the look-back period. Another resident was discharged home, but the discharge MDS was incorrectly coded as a planned discharge to an acute hospital. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident was discharged home and that the MDS should have been coded accordingly. The MDS Coordinator was not available for interview regarding this discrepancy. A third resident with a long-standing stage 4 pressure ulcer was incorrectly coded on the MDS as having a stage 2 pressure ulcer. Medical records and wound consultant notes indicated the presence of a stage 4 pressure ulcer, and staff interviews confirmed the wound had improved but was still present. The Director of Nursing stated the wound was now a stage 2 ulcer, which was why it was coded as such, despite clinical standards requiring that a healing stage 4 ulcer continue to be documented as stage 4 until fully healed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙