Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Maintain Facility-Specific Water Management Program for Infection Control

New Bedford, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 08-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically regarding its water management program intended to prevent the growth and transmission of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens. Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Program policy and related documentation revealed that the written description of the building's water system and devices was not specific to the actual facility. The water system flow diagram included features, such as a trellis fountain and references to water supplied by the town, that did not exist in the facility. Additionally, the diagram did not clearly identify or classify hazardous areas or conditions that could encourage bacterial growth, such as stagnation, permissive temperatures, lack of disinfectant, or external hazards. Interviews with the Director of Maintenance and the Administrator confirmed that the water management program and assessment were not tailored to the facility and did not meet all required criteria. The Director of Maintenance acknowledged that the documentation was not specific to the facility and that the flow diagram failed to depict hazardous concerns. The Administrator also confirmed that the program should have been facility-specific and comprehensive, as required by policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙