Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Resident Excluded from Discharge Planning Despite Retaining Decision-Making Rights

Randolph, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident retained the right to participate in their own discharge planning process. The resident, who had a history of congestive heart failure and alcohol use disorder, was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment but remained their own healthcare decision maker, as the Health Care Proxy had not been activated by the physician. Despite this, the facility conducted a discharge planning meeting with the resident's sibling and facility staff, without inviting or involving the resident. The medical record did not document any participation or input from the resident regarding the discharge plan. Interviews revealed that the resident was unaware of the discharge plan and expressed a desire to return home with siblings, while staff believed the plan was for discharge to an assisted living facility. The social worker involved in the discharge planning admitted that the resident was not invited to the meeting and that she mistakenly thought the Health Care Proxy had been invoked, leading to the sibling making decisions. The physician confirmed that the resident continued to make their own decisions, and the social worker later acknowledged the resident should have been included in the discharge planning process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙