Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Uphold Resident Dignity and Preferences

Centerville, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to uphold residents' rights to dignity and respect in two specific cases. In the first case, a resident with a history of bipolar disorder and mental illness, who was cognitively intact, was not addressed by their preferred nickname despite the family informing staff of this preference. The resident's care plan and medical record did not reflect the preferred name, and staff continued to address the resident by their last name. Observations confirmed that even after signs were placed in the resident's room indicating the preferred nickname, staff persisted in using the last name during interactions. In the second case, a resident with significant urinary and kidney conditions, including retention of urine, hydronephrosis, and obstructive uropathy, had an indwelling catheter. On multiple occasions, the resident's urinary drainage bag was observed to be uncovered and fully visible, positioned on the bed rail facing the doorway, without a privacy bag. Several staff members, including CNAs and the unit manager, acknowledged that the catheter bag should have been covered to maintain the resident's privacy and dignity, but this was not done. Both deficiencies were identified through direct observation, interviews with staff and family, and review of medical records and care plans. The facility's own policies emphasized resident-centered care and the importance of recognizing individual preferences, but these were not followed in the cases described, resulting in a failure to treat the residents with the dignity and respect required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙