Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Wound and Medical Devices

Amesbury, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $117,450
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program by not applying Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with multiple risk factors, including an open wound, colostomy, and an interventional radiology (IR) drain. Observations revealed that the resident did not have an EBP sign on or near the door, and staff, including a unit manager, assessed the resident's wounds and manipulated the IR drain while wearing gloves but not gowns, as required by EBP protocols. The care plan for the resident did not include interventions for EBP, and there was no physician's order for EBP in the resident's medical record. The resident had a history of necrotizing fasciitis, septicemia, and diabetes mellitus, and was cognitively intact at the time of the deficiency. Physician's orders included wound care, colostomy care, and management of the IR drain, but did not address EBP. The Infection Preventionist confirmed that the resident should have been on EBP, with appropriate signage, care plan interventions, and staff use of gowns during high-contact care activities, but acknowledged these measures were not in place.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙