Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents

Amesbury, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $117,450
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for six residents, resulting in multiple inaccuracies in resident records. For one resident with diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis, septicemia, and diabetes mellitus, the MDS assessments repeatedly documented the presence of stage four pressure ulcers, despite the medical record and staff interviews confirming that the resident never had pressure ulcers during their admission. Both the MDS nurse and the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that these MDS entries were inaccurate. Another resident with Alzheimer's disease and severe cognitive impairment was incorrectly coded on the MDS as using bedrails daily as physical restraints. Observations and record reviews showed that the resident's bed did not have bedrails, and there was no documentation of restraint use in the care plan or assessment records. Staff interviews confirmed that bedrails were not used for this resident and that the MDS coding was inaccurate. Additionally, three residents were inaccurately coded regarding their pneumococcal vaccination status. In two cases, the MDS indicated that the residents were up to date with the vaccine, but medical records showed that although consent was obtained, the vaccine had not been administered due to unavailability from the pharmacy. In another case, the MDS stated the vaccine was not offered, but documentation showed that consent had been signed. For another resident, an MDS assessment was completed after a hospital transfer, indicating a staff assessment of cognition, even though the resident did not return to the facility, making such an assessment impossible. Staff interviews confirmed these inaccuracies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙