Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0800
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Documented Dietary Preference

East Longmeadow, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 08-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's stated dietary preference for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich with every dinner meal, despite this preference being documented on the resident's dietary slip. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired but able to communicate and understand, reported that he or she could not tolerate regular dinner meals due to stomach upset and had repeatedly requested the sandwich as a substitute. The resident stated that the sandwich was only provided once or twice a week, and when it was not included on the dinner tray, the resident would not eat dinner. The resident also expressed reluctance to repeatedly ask staff for the sandwich, as the request had already been made and documented. Interviews with facility staff, including the dietitian and Food Service Director, confirmed that the resident's preference was known and should have been honored according to facility policy. The dietitian acknowledged the importance of providing the requested sandwich to prevent nutritional complications and confirmed that the information had been communicated to the dietary team. Despite this, the dietary staff did not consistently provide the sandwich as requested, resulting in the resident missing dinner meals when the preference was not met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙