Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Diagnoses and Medication Management

Amesbury, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents. For one resident with diagnoses including dementia, encephalopathy, and bipolar disorder, the MDS was inaccurately coded to indicate that a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of antipsychotic medication was clinically contraindicated, based on documentation from a psychiatric nurse practitioner. However, review of the nurse practitioner's notes did not support that a GDR was clinically contraindicated, and the MDS nurse acknowledged that the notes used were not appropriate for coding the MDS. Additionally, another resident with vascular dementia, hemiplegia, anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder had multiple MDS assessments that failed to include the diagnoses of anxiety and depression, as the MDS nurse was unaware of these diagnoses. A third resident with a history of stroke and dementia had an MDS assessment that inaccurately coded the presence and development of pressure injuries, with the MDS nurse confirming the inaccuracy. These findings were based on record reviews and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙