Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Care Plans for Elopement and Smoking

Saugus, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $93,020
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement appropriate care plans for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to elopement and smoking safety. One resident with diagnoses including myopathy and dementia, and a documented history of attempted elopement, was admitted without a care plan addressing elopement risk. Despite hospital discharge paperwork noting a prior elopement attempt and nursing notes describing behaviors such as attempting to leave the facility and refusing to return inside after going out to smoke, the resident's care plan did not include interventions for elopement. The facility's own policy required assessment and prevention strategies for residents at risk of elopement, but these were not followed for this resident. Another resident, admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dysphagia, and who was cognitively intact, was known to be a smoker and participated in supervised smoking times. However, a care plan addressing smoking safety was not developed until approximately two months after admission, contrary to the facility's policy that required immediate assessment and documentation of smoking safety needs in the care plan. Both deficiencies were confirmed through record review and staff interviews, which acknowledged that care plans for elopement and smoking should have been implemented upon admission.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙