Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Vision and Transfer Assistance

Saugus, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $93,020
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the documentation of vision status and transfer assistance. For one resident with a history of hyperglycemia, repeated falls, and documented diagnoses of cataracts and macular degeneration, the MDS inaccurately indicated adequate vision and no use of corrective lenses, despite multiple clinical notes and resident statements confirming significant vision impairment and the need for cataract surgery. The MDS coordinator and DON acknowledged awareness of the resident's vision issues, but the assessment did not reflect the actual condition. For two other residents, both with significant medical histories and preferences to remain in bed, the facility failed to accurately code the level of assistance provided for transfers. Despite CNA charting indicating dependent assistance for transfers out of bed to wheelchair, interviews with CNAs, the MDS nurse, and the DON confirmed that these residents had not been transferred out of bed for months, and the documentation should have reflected that transfers were not applicable. The inaccurate CNA documentation led to incorrect MDS coding for both residents. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual guidelines, with CNA documentation based on hypothetical assistance rather than actual care provided. The MDS nurse and DON both stated that MDS assessments should be based on actual assistance provided and current resident status, but the failure to ensure accurate documentation and assessment resulted in the deficiencies identified during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙