Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Resident Restrained During Podiatry Care Without Proper Assessment

Chelsea, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with significant cognitive impairment, dementia, and diabetes was subjected to physical restraint during a podiatry care session. The facility's policy required that physical restraints only be used after assessment by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and when alternatives had been deemed ineffective, but this process was not followed. The Charge Nurse made the unilateral decision to proceed with podiatry care despite the resident's history of resistance and recent refusals of such care. During the procedure, the Charge Nurse laid across the resident's lap and legs to prevent movement, while a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) and a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) held the resident's hands. The resident verbally expressed refusal and distress multiple times, requesting for the care to stop and to be left alone. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was agitated, combative, and verbally objected to the care, yet the procedure continued with physical restraint. The COTA reported feeling uncomfortable with the method used, as it limited the resident's mobility, and stated he would not have participated had he known restraint was being used as the only means to complete the care. The Charge Nurse later acknowledged that her approach was inappropriate and that the situation should have been handled differently, such as consulting a physician for alternative arrangements. The incident was reported internally and confirmed by multiple staff members.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙