Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0887
D

Failure to Obtain Guardian Consent for COVID-19 Vaccination

Baltimore, Maryland Survey Completed on 07-07-2025

Penalty

Fine: $484,200
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that the court-appointed guardian of a resident who was incapable of making decisions was provided with education and the opportunity to consent to or decline a COVID-19 vaccine booster on the resident's behalf. The resident's medical record confirmed the presence of a court-appointed guardian since 2017, yet the immunization record only showed electronic consent forms indicating that education was provided and the resident refused the vaccine. There was no documentation that the guardian was contacted, educated, or given the opportunity to provide or withhold consent for the vaccine. Interviews with facility staff, including the current and former Infection Preventionists (IPs), revealed that the established process required contacting the guardian, providing education, and obtaining consent or declination, either verbally or in writing. The electronic documentation system allowed for specifying whether the resident or guardian provided consent, but in this case, the records only reflected the resident's refusal, not the guardian's involvement. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the electronic documentation did not reflect the required guardian contact.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙