Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Individualize Care Plans for Residents with Substance Use Disorder

Baltimore, Maryland Survey Completed on 07-07-2025

Penalty

Fine: $484,200
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement individualized care plans for residents with substance use disorder (SUD), as evidenced by medical record reviews of three residents. One resident with intact cognition and a diagnosis of SUD was found unresponsive and required emergency interventions including CPR, multiple doses of Narcan, and use of an AED. The care plan for this resident only included general monitoring and medication administration, omitting specific interventions such as participation in SUD group meetings, 1:1 support, and mental health or recovery services, despite the resident's involvement in these activities. There were also no documented notes from the social worker or evidence of interdisciplinary discussion regarding interventions in the quality assurance records. Another resident with SUD was found unresponsive in the courtyard and required Narcan administration before regaining consciousness. The care plan for this resident lacked documentation of SUD-specific interventions, such as group meetings or mental health services, even though the resident was receiving these services. A third resident with a history of opioid use and recent Narcan administration did not have an updated care plan reflecting behavioral health involvement, behavioral contracts, or references to SUD nurse practitioner visits or group participation. In all cases, interviews with facility leadership yielded no responses regarding the deficiencies in care planning.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙