Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Provide Residents with Requested Alternative Menu Choices

Walkersville, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received their chosen alternative menu items, as required to support resident self-determination and choice. During a dining observation, one resident's dinner tray included two meal tickets: one indicating a request for a peanut butter & jelly sandwich with extra gravy and hot tea, but the tray instead contained steak and rice without gravy, and no sandwich or hot tea. This demonstrated that the resident's specific meal preferences were not honored. Interviews with other residents at the same table revealed similar issues. One resident reported not always receiving requested alternative meals, despite submitting a meal ticket and later handing it directly to kitchen staff. Another resident stated they no longer submit alternative food requests because their previous requests were not fulfilled. A third resident indicated the system for requesting menu alternatives was ineffective, leading them to make verbal requests directly to kitchen staff instead of using the formal process. The Certified Dietary Manager Consultant confirmed that the current system for handling alternative meal requests was not effective.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙