Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate Coding of MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents

Elkton, Maryland Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for multiple residents, as evidenced by discrepancies between the MDS documentation and the residents' medical records. In several cases, the MDS did not reflect significant clinical events or medication administration, such as substantial weight loss, falls, and the use of specific medications including antibiotics, opioids, hypoglycemics, antiplatelets, and pain relievers. For example, one resident experienced a weight loss of over 20 pounds, but the MDS did not indicate a 10% or greater weight loss. Another resident had two documented falls, but the MDS assessment stated no falls had occurred during the relevant period. Additional deficiencies were noted in the failure to accurately document medication administration. Several residents received medications such as insulin, antibiotics, opioids, antiplatelets, and pain medications, but these were not captured in the corresponding MDS assessments. In one instance, a resident received both scheduled and PRN pain medications, as well as topical antibiotics, but the MDS failed to record these treatments. Similarly, another resident received a PPD injection for tuberculosis screening, which was not documented in the MDS. These inaccuracies were confirmed through interviews with MDS coordinators and review of medication administration records (MARs). The findings indicate that the facility did not consistently ensure that the MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' clinical status and care provided during the assessment periods, as required by federal regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙