Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate and Document Abuse Allegation

Chestertown, Maryland Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse and did not maintain adequate documentation. A resident reported to a nurse supervisor that a staff member made inappropriate comments during medication administration, which made the resident feel uncomfortable and embarrassed. The facility's initial response included contacting the police, suspending the alleged perpetrator, and arranging for a psychiatric nurse practitioner and social worker to meet with the resident. Statements were collected from involved parties. However, the facility's follow-up investigation relied solely on a nurse practitioner's progress note, which attributed the resident's report to attention-seeking behavior and fantasies, despite no documented history of such behaviors in the resident's medical or psychiatric records. The facility was unable to provide documentation supporting its conclusion that the incident could not be substantiated, including evidence of behavioral concerns, records of a psychological evaluation related to the incident, or verification that the social worker met with the resident as claimed. The administrator acknowledged that the decision not to substantiate the incident was based only on the nurse practitioner's note and that resident records were not reviewed. The lack of thorough investigation and supporting documentation led to the cited deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙