Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Implement and Document Individualized Pressure Ulcer Prevention Measures

Catonsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to implement appropriate individualized interventions for a resident identified as at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Upon admission, the resident was noted to have redness to the groin and buttock, but the documentation did not specify the size or whether the redness was blanchable. Physician orders included daily and weekly skin checks, weekly Braden Scale assessments for four weeks, and application of a moisture barrier cream. However, staff did not complete the required weekly Braden Scale assessments as ordered, and the interim plan of care did not specify individualized interventions to address the resident's skin integrity risk. The comprehensive care plan also lacked specific measures for turning and repositioning, use of prescribed moisture barrier cream, and the pressure-reducing device, despite the resident's dependence on staff for mobility and hygiene. The resident later developed an open area on the sacrum, which was first identified as unstageable, prompting new interventions such as an alternating pressure mattress, urinary catheter, and scheduled turning and repositioning. Documentation revealed that staff did not consistently record turning and repositioning assistance both before and after these interventions were added to the care plan. Interviews with the attending physician and DON confirmed that appropriate interventions were not in place or documented prior to the development of the pressure ulcer, and that staff failed to follow physician orders and facility protocols for residents at risk of pressure ulcers.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙