Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Maintain Accurate and Complete Medical Records

Clinton, Maryland Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for two residents. For one resident, a review of the closed medical record revealed that the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form was incomplete, as the front page did not indicate the resident's wishes regarding life-sustaining care. The certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) responsible for completing the form acknowledged during an interview that the first page had not been filled out after discussing care preferences with the resident. For another resident, progress notes written by the staff developer included late entries documenting that the resident had refused showers, received education, and that notifications were made to the resident representative and physician. However, a review of the geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) documentation showed no record of a shower refusal, but rather that a bed bath was given. The staff developer later clarified that while the refusals were based on shower sheets, the education and notifications did not occur on the dates documented in the progress notes, resulting in inaccurate recordkeeping. The director of nursing agreed that the progress notes did not accurately reflect the events that occurred.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙