Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Resident Care Plans

Clinton, Maryland Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans for multiple residents, as evidenced by three specific cases. In one instance, a resident with no cognitive impairment but significant physical limitations was able to leave the facility premises without staff knowledge, ultimately being found at a nearby shopping center parking lot. Despite a prior physician's order requiring supervision for leave of absence and an MDS assessment indicating the resident was wheelchair-bound, the facility did not recognize the incident as an elopement, did not update the elopement risk assessment appropriately, and failed to create a care plan or interventions to prevent recurrence. Both the DON and NHA acknowledged not recognizing the event as an elopement. In another case, a resident was discharged from the facility without a discharge care plan, and the responsible social worker could not provide a rationale for this omission. Additionally, a third resident, who was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder according to MDS assessments and a bowel elimination pattern document, had no care plan addressing incontinence, despite complaints of malodor and lack of ADL care. The DON confirmed the absence of an incontinence care plan for this resident. These findings demonstrate a pattern of failure to develop and implement individualized care plans based on residents' assessed needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙