Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Protect Resident from Verbal Abuse by Staff

Clinton, Maryland Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a staff member during the provision of activities of daily living (ADL) care. The incident involved a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) who made inappropriate comments regarding the resident's bowel movements and further told the resident that they should be in a hospital rather than the facility. The resident was upset by these statements, and the incident was reported by the resident's family. The resident had a care plan in place for psychosocial well-being, which included encouragement for communication. The facility conducted an internal investigation and determined the allegation of verbal abuse to be unsubstantiated, despite the GNA admitting to making the upsetting statements. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the GNA did not receive re-education on abuse prohibition, although other nursing staff did. The DON also acknowledged that the GNA admitted to the statements but believed there was no intent to harm and that adequate care was provided after the incident. The surveyor noted that the determination of verbal abuse is based on the resident's perception, and in this case, the resident felt verbally abused.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙