Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0655
D

Failure to Provide and Document Baseline Care Plans Upon Admission

Catonsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan (BLCP), including a current list of medications, was provided to residents and/or their representatives and documented in the medical record within 48 hours of admission. For two residents reviewed, there was no evidence in the electronic health record (EHR) that the BLCP was present under the designated section, nor was there documentation that the BLCP had been provided to the resident or their representative. In one case, a resident with severely impaired cognition, as indicated by a BIMS score of 0, had a BLCP signed by the resident instead of the representative, contrary to facility expectations. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the required documentation and signatures were missing and that the BLCP was not properly scanned into the EHR. In another instance, a resident with dementia and a BIMS score of 2 had a BLCP with missing signatures from both the staff and the resident or representative, and there was no evidence that the BLCP or medication list had been provided. The DON and Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) verified that the required fields were incomplete and that the documentation process had not been followed as expected. These findings were based on medical record reviews and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙