Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Assess Nonverbal and Cognitively Impaired Residents During Abuse Investigation

Rockville, Maryland Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $12,735
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that nonverbal and/or cognitively impaired residents were assessed during an abuse investigation. According to facility policy, the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing (DON) are required to immediately initiate a thorough internal investigation of any alleged abuse, which includes collecting evidence and interviewing alleged victims and witnesses. In this case, a resident reported physical abuse, prompting the suspension of a male staff member and interviews with staff and other residents on the same hallway. However, the investigation documentation revealed that two residents were unable to speak and one was unable to answer, and there was no evidence that these nonverbal or cognitively impaired residents were assessed as part of the investigation. During an interview, the DON confirmed that she could not verify whether nonverbal or cognitively impaired residents were assessed during the investigation. She acknowledged that she should have assessed these residents and admitted that a thorough investigation was not completed. The facility's failure to include assessments of nonverbal and cognitively impaired residents during the abuse investigation constituted a deficiency in following their own investigative protocols.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙