Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Develop and Implement Resident-Centered Care Plans

Sykesville, Maryland Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans that accurately reflected the assessed needs and preferences of multiple residents. For one resident with expressive aphasia and total dependence on staff for activities of daily living, the care plan did not include specific information about the resident's music preferences, television programs, or religious denomination, despite these being documented as important in assessments. The care plan also lacked documentation of certain activities, such as hand massages, that were reportedly provided. The Activity Director acknowledged that care plans did not always reflect assessment findings and that staff often relied on assumptions rather than resident input. Another resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairment reported not participating in activities due to a lack of interest and was unaware of care planning meetings. The care plan for this resident did not address their stated preferences for religious services and access to reading materials, which were documented as very important in the MDS assessment. Similarly, a resident with a history of stroke and cognitive deficits stated that they used personal devices for entertainment and required assistance to attend activities, but their care plan did not specify their preferences for church attendance or reading materials, despite these being identified during assessments and interviews. Additionally, a resident admitted to the facility had only a baseline care plan documented, with no comprehensive care plan completed within the required timeframe following the comprehensive assessment. There was also a lack of documentation indicating that the interdisciplinary team regularly attended care plan meetings. Staff interviews confirmed these deficiencies, and facility leadership acknowledged the concerns raised by surveyors regarding the lack of individualized, assessment-based care planning.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙