Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Timely Review and Revise Care Plans by Interdisciplinary Team

Waterville, Maine Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), including participation of the resident and/or their representative, within 7 days following each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for multiple residents. Specifically, for several residents, there was either a delay in holding the IDT meeting after the MDS assessment, the meeting was held before the assessment was completed, or there was no evidence that the meeting occurred within the required timeframe. For example, one resident's IDT meeting was held 17 days after the MDS assessment, another's was held 19 days after, and in some cases, the IDT meeting was held prior to the completion of the MDS. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the scheduling of IDT meetings was based on the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), and not always aligned with the completion of the MDS as required. Additionally, the care plans for some residents were not updated to reflect current diagnoses and care needs. One resident's care plan did not specify the cause or location of chronic pain and failed to address the monitoring and management of atrial fibrillation, a history of genital herpes, and MRSA, despite these being active or relevant diagnoses. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that certain diagnoses had not been included or updated in the care plan, and there was no documentation explaining the omissions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙