Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Ensure Accurate and Consistent Documentation of Residents' Code Status

Mandeville, Louisiana Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

Fine: $146,520
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that all medical records accurately reflected the residents' wishes regarding code status for two residents. For one resident, the clinical record showed a LaPOST form indicating Full Code status, while the current physician orders and care plan documented Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Multiple staff interviews confirmed the inconsistency between the LaPOST and the physician orders, and staff acknowledged that the documentation should have matched to reflect the resident's wishes. For another resident, the clinical record and care plan indicated Full Code status, but the physical hard chart contained both a LaPOST form indicating DNR and an advance directive form indicating Full Code. Staff interviews revealed that during an emergency, staff would refer to whichever form was on top in the chart, potentially leading to confusion. Staff responsible for updating code status documentation confirmed that only the most current code status should be present in the chart, and the presence of conflicting documents could result in staff not honoring the resident's actual wishes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙