Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Care Plan for Wandering Resident

Butler, Kentucky Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident who exhibited exit-seeking and wandering behaviors. Despite the resident being identified as having severe cognitive impairment and being assessed for wandering and elopement risk, there was no care plan addressing these behaviors or the use of a Wander Guard device. Documentation showed that the resident attempted to exit the facility, was evaluated for elopement risk, and had a Wander Guard applied, yet these interventions were not reflected in the resident's care plan. Facility policy required that residents with wandering or elopement risk receive adequate supervision and have their needs addressed in a person-centered care plan. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the omission of a care plan for wandering was an oversight, and that multiple staff were responsible for reviewing care plans. The lack of a care plan meant that staff did not have documented guidance on how to address the resident's wandering behaviors, contrary to facility policy and professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙