Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Prevent and Identify Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Resident

Louisville, Kentucky Survey Completed on 06-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate pressure ulcer prevention and care for one resident identified as at risk for skin breakdown. The facility's policies required weekly skin observations by licensed nurses, daily skin checks by nursing assistants during personal care, and prompt notification of any skin impairment. Despite these policies, documentation and interviews revealed that the resident, who was admitted with multiple comorbidities and significant physical limitations, did not receive thorough and timely skin assessments. Progress notes indicated that the resident was unable to reposition independently and required a mechanical lift, yet there were gaps in the documentation of comprehensive skin assessments, particularly during the initial days following admission and while the resident was in isolation precautions. The resident's care plan identified them as at risk for pressure ulcers, with interventions such as weekly skin assessments, assistance with turning and repositioning, and heel protection. However, records showed that daily skin assessments documented no concerns, even though subsequent wound assessments identified multiple deep tissue injuries, including to the sacrum, right heel, and penis. Staff interviews confirmed that while wound care was eventually provided, initial assessments may not have been thorough, especially for areas not easily visible without repositioning the resident. The lack of early identification and intervention contributed to the development and worsening of pressure injuries. Further review of the resident's history showed that upon admission, there were no documented skin issues, but within ten days, multiple unstageable deep tissue injuries were present. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the process for conducting head-to-toe skin assessments, particularly for residents with limited mobility or those in isolation. The facility's failure to consistently implement its own policies and ensure comprehensive skin assessments led to the resident developing significant pressure injuries that required further medical intervention.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙