Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0835
D

Failure to Report Resident Elopement to State Agency

Murray, Kentucky Survey Completed on 05-10-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled effective and efficient use of its resources to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident, specifically related to the failure of the Administrator and/or DON to notify the state regulatory office of an elopement incident. On 04/18/2025, a resident exited her room, traversed multiple doors, entered a staff area, and ultimately accessed the facility's loading dock, where she operated a lift and was elevated above the pavement. The facility's policies required reporting such incidents to the State Survey Agency, but this was not done. Interviews with the DON and Administrator revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the incident. The DON was not present at the time and, after being informed, recognized the event as an elopement but did not report it. The Administrator, also absent during the incident, initially did not consider the event an elopement and therefore did not report it, only acknowledging the requirement after regulatory review. Both the Administrator and DON's job descriptions included responsibilities for regulatory compliance and incident reporting, which were not fulfilled in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙