Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0605
D

Failure to Document Indication and Rationale for Antipsychotic Use

Fort Dodge, Kansas Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving psychotropic medication, specifically an antipsychotic, had an appropriate clinical indication or a documented physician rationale for its continued use. The resident had diagnoses of depression and anxiety, with cognitive impairment documented over time. Despite the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications, there was no evidence in the medical record of behaviors that would warrant antipsychotic use, nor was there documentation of unsuccessful nonpharmacological interventions or a risk versus benefit analysis for the continued use of the antipsychotic. The resident's care plan included general instructions for monitoring and consulting with the pharmacy and physician, but lacked specific documentation of attempts at gradual dose reduction or alternative therapies. Review of the medication regimen and pharmacy consultant notes did not identify a clear diagnosis or justification for the antipsychotic medication, and staff interviews confirmed uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of the diagnosis for the medication. The facility was unable to provide a policy on psychotropic medication use. These actions and omissions resulted in the resident being at risk for adverse effects associated with unnecessary psychotropic medication use.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙