Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess and Document Use of Wheelchair Seatbelt as Physical Restraint

Fort Dodge, Kansas Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to ensure an environment free from physical restraints for a resident who used a motorized wheelchair with a seatbelt. The resident, who had diagnoses including COPD and atrial fibrillation and demonstrated intact cognition, was observed wearing a seatbelt that he could not independently release. Documentation in the electronic health record, care plan, and physician orders did not address the use of the seatbelt, nor was there evidence of an assessment of the resident's ability to release it. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was required to wear the seatbelt, was unable to remove it on his own, and that no seatbelt safety assessment or care plan was in place for any resident. The resident reported he was told he had to wear the seatbelt and did not have a choice in the matter. Observations showed the seatbelt remained engaged for extended periods, and staff were responsible for applying and releasing it. Staff also indicated that not all residents required seatbelts and that it was policy for residents using electric wheelchairs to wear them, but there was no clear process for evaluating whether a seatbelt constituted a restraint. The facility's policy required a practitioner's order for a restraint, but no such order or documentation was present for the seatbelt. The lack of assessment, documentation, and resident choice led to the use of a physical restraint without proper justification or oversight.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙