Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Verify and Legalize Advance Directives for DNR Orders

Independence, Kansas Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that advance directives, specifically Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, were properly verified and legally executed for several residents. For one resident with multiple significant medical conditions, including morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperkalemia, heart failure, and hypertension, the electronic health record and care plan indicated a DNR status. However, the scanned DNR directive in the resident's record was not signed by a physician, rendering it not legally valid. Interviews with nursing and administrative staff confirmed that a valid DNR requires both the resident's (or legal representative's) and physician's signatures, and that the current document did not meet these requirements. Facility policy required that advance directives be complete, maintained in the clinical record, and reviewed quarterly or upon significant change. Despite these policies, the resident's DNR directive lacked the necessary physician signature, and staff acknowledged this deficiency. The failure to ensure the DNR directive was properly executed and legally valid was identified through observation, record review, and staff interviews, and was not limited to a single resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙