Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents

Iola, Kansas Survey Completed on 07-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, resulting in documentation errors regarding their clinical status and care needs. For one resident with Parkinson’s disease and dementia, the Significant Change MDS incorrectly recorded the number and type of falls, documenting only one non-injury fall when records showed two falls, one of which resulted in a minor injury. Observations confirmed the resident’s high level of dependency and fall risk, and staff interviews acknowledged the MDS inaccuracy. The facility’s own documentation and staff statements confirmed that the MDS did not accurately reflect the resident’s fall history as required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. For another resident with dementia, the Quarterly MDS inaccurately indicated that the resident received an anticoagulant during the assessment period, when in fact the resident was only receiving an antiplatelet medication (aspirin). The resident’s cognitive status was also documented inconsistently between assessments. Staff interviews confirmed the MDS error, and facility policy required accurate and timely completion of the MDS. These inaccuracies in the MDS assessments placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified or misidentified care needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙