Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement and Identify Correct Infection Control Precautions

Centerville, Iowa Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to consistently wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact care activities for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and did not correctly implement or identify the required level of infection control precautions for a resident on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP). For one resident with arthritis, heart failure, hypertension, and unstageable pressure ulcer, staff measured and cared for wounds while wearing gloves but not a gown, despite facility policy requiring both gown and gloves for wound care under EBP. Staff interviews confirmed knowledge of the policy, but the LPN involved did not wear a gown, stating she did not expect drainage from the wound. Another resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fibromyalgia, and an indwelling urinary catheter required substantial assistance with personal hygiene and had excoriated areas identified as a yeast infection. During personal care and catheter-related activities, one LPN wore only gloves while assisting with intimate care tasks, including repositioning and perineal care, while another LPN wore both gown and gloves. The LPN who did not wear a gown stated she believed it was unnecessary since she was not performing catheter care, despite direct contact with the resident and the presence of open skin areas. For a third resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and an indwelling urinary catheter, the facility failed to clearly identify and implement the correct level of infection control precautions. Although the resident was on TBP for a Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) infection, the signage on the door only indicated EBP, and the resident was not listed on the facility's matrix as being on TBP. Staff interviews revealed confusion between EBP and TBP, and some staff were unaware of any residents on contact precautions, despite the resident's status and facility policy requiring contact precautions for VRE.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙