Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Follow Dietician-Approved Menus and Provide Adequate Substitutions

Muscatine, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the dietician-approved menu was consistently followed and that adequate quantities of approved substitutions were available to all residents. Kitchen staff reported that when preparing meals, they sometimes lacked necessary ingredients and made substitutions, particularly with vegetables or fruits, without always obtaining prior approval from the Dietary Manager or Registered Dietician. Substitutions were sometimes made based on resident preferences, such as serving goulash instead of beef macaroni casserole, and additional portions of the main course were only provided if there was enough left after initial servings. The Registered Dietician confirmed that she was not always contacted regarding substitutions and only signed off on them during her visits, contrary to her expectation that planned menus be followed to meet residents' nutritional needs. Interviews with residents revealed dissatisfaction with the food, citing limited options, lack of choices, and insufficient portion sizes. The facility's policy required that food substitutes be of similar nutritive value and that the Food Services Department offer alternatives for residents who did not want the primary meal. However, the observed practices did not consistently align with these guidelines, as substitutions were not always approved or equivalent, and residents' preferences and needs were not fully met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙