Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Follow Physician's Order for Pressure Ulcer Intervention

Urbandale, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to follow a physician's order for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, congestive heart failure, kidney disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and a right heel pressure ulcer. The physician's order and care plan both directed that Prevalon boots be applied at all times as tolerated, except when the resident was weight-bearing, to promote wound healing. Multiple observations on different occasions showed the resident was not wearing the Prevalon boots while in her wheelchair or in bed, and staff were unable to locate the boots in her room. Interviews with various staff members, including CNAs, a CMA, and an LPN, confirmed that the resident was non-weight bearing, required a mechanical lift for transfers, and had not refused care. Staff also indicated that the boots should have been on while the resident was in bed, in a wheelchair, or in a lift sling, and that there was no documentation or notification of refusal. The LPN was unaware the resident was not wearing the boots, and the DON stated the expectation was for this intervention to be included in the care plan rather than as a physician's order.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙