Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Code Status Documentation for Resident

Fairfield, Iowa Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's code status was clear and consistent across all documentation sources. Clinical record review showed that the electronic health record (EHR) listed the resident as Full Code, while a physical document in a binder at the nurses' station indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status. The resident had diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Staff interviews revealed that staff would check either the EHR or the binder at the nurses' station to determine code status, depending on which was more convenient. Facility policy required that resuscitation status be maintained in the clinical record, but the discrepancy between the EHR and the binder was not addressed prior to surveyor identification.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙