Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan After New PTSD Diagnosis

Dubuque, Iowa Survey Completed on 07-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to update the care plan for one resident after a new mental health diagnosis was identified. Clinical record review showed that the resident had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and anxiety, as documented in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and the Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review (PASRR). The electronic health record listed PTSD as a diagnosis, but the care plan, last revised on 6/20/25, did not reflect this updated diagnosis or address PTSD as required. The Trauma Informed Intake assessment indicated that the trauma care plan should be reviewed or updated, but this was not done. During staff interviews, the MDS Coordinator stated that the resident did not know her PTSD triggers and that there was no facility policy guiding what to include in the care plan, though she followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). The DON stated that she expected PTSD to be addressed in the care plan. Facility policy required care plans to be reviewed and revised after significant changes in a resident's condition, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙