Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Infection Prevention Protocols for Residents with Indwelling Urinary Devices

Keosauqua, Iowa Survey Completed on 08-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow infection prevention protocols for two residents with indwelling urinary devices. For one resident with a urostomy and colostomy, staff did not consistently use Enhanced Barrier Precautions as required. During care, a CNA donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when emptying the colostomy bag but failed to wear an isolation gown when emptying the urostomy bag, despite facility expectations and staff interviews confirming that a gown, gloves, and face shield should be used. Additionally, the resident's care plan lacked specific direction regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions during device care, and the facility's catheter care policy did not address the need for such precautions for residents with indwelling urinary devices. For another resident with a suprapubic catheter, a nurse cleansed the catheter insertion site while wearing gloves but did not change gloves before applying a new dry dressing, contrary to facility expectations and staff interviews. The nurse acknowledged forgetting to change gloves during the observed care. The facility's policy on suprapubic catheter care did not include steps for applying a clean dry dressing, contributing to the lack of adherence to infection control protocols.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙