Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Update and Document Advanced Directives and Code Status

West Lafayette, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents' code statuses were accurately updated and that required physician signatures were obtained on advanced directive forms. For one resident with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, cardiomegaly, and hypertension, the clinical record showed a full code status order, while a POST form completed by the resident's POA indicated a DNR status but lacked a physician's signature. The resident herself expressed a desire to be DNR, and facility leadership acknowledged that the form should have been completed by the physician and the code status updated accordingly. Facility policy required that advanced directives be reviewed at admission and quarterly, with nursing staff responsible for confirming code status and obtaining physician orders, but this process was not followed. For another resident with immunodeficiency and other conditions, conflicting code status orders were present in the EHR, with both full code and DNR orders documented within a short period. There was no POST form in the EHR for this resident. Staff interviews revealed confusion regarding which code status to follow when discrepancies existed, with the practice being to use the highest code status. The lack of consistent documentation and failure to obtain and maintain accurate, physician-signed advanced directive forms led to deficiencies in honoring residents' wishes regarding end-of-life care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙