Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
D

Failure to Notify Physician and Responsible Party of Critically High Blood Glucose Levels

Georgetown, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to notify the physician and the resident's responsible party regarding multiple instances of elevated blood glucose levels for one resident. The resident had a history of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, edema, diabetes, a right ankle wound, and unspecified dementia. Physician orders required staff to notify the physician if the resident's blood sugar exceeded 400 mg/dL. Despite this, record review showed several occasions where the resident's blood sugar was above this threshold, including readings of 421, 445, 520, 400, and 418 mg/dL. There was no documentation indicating that the physician or responsible party had been notified of these critical values. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the protocol was to notify the provider and family immediately if blood glucose values were outside the critical range, and to document the change and notifications. The facility's own guidelines also required notification of any critical lab value. However, the clinical record lacked evidence that these notifications occurred for the resident's elevated blood glucose levels, constituting a failure to follow established procedures for change of condition notification.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙