Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Accurately Record Catheter Urine Output

Lebanon, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate recording of catheter urine output for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including sepsis, infection and inflammatory reaction due to the catheter, bacteremia, hematuria, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and urinary retention. Physician orders required the monitoring of catheter output three times daily, and the resident was also receiving diuretic medication for edema. However, documentation from the facility showed that staff recorded urine output using qualitative terms such as 'small,' 'medium,' or 'large' instead of measuring and recording the exact amount in milliliters as required by both physician orders and facility policy. Interviews with staff confirmed that the expected practice was to use a calibrated measuring container to determine the precise urine output and document the amount in the medical record. Facility policies on emptying urinary bags and catheter care also specified the need for accurate measurement and recording of urine output. Despite these requirements, the medical record for the resident consistently lacked quantitative measurements, leading to a deficiency in the standard of care provided.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙