Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Peritoneal Dialysis

Frankfort, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow physician's orders for peritoneal dialysis for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The orders required staff to take vital signs before and after dialysis, use the resident's morning weight and systolic blood pressure to determine dialysis dose, and to call the dialysis clinic for further instructions if the resident's weight exceeded 216 pounds. Additionally, specific instructions were provided for the use of different dialysis solution bags based on the resident's systolic blood pressure. However, the facility did not clarify conflicting orders regarding which bags to use when the systolic blood pressure was low, and staff did not consistently follow the orders as written. Review of dialysis treatment logs revealed multiple instances where the prescribed protocol was not followed. On several occasions, when the resident's systolic blood pressure was below the specified threshold, the dialysis solution bags used were based on weight rather than blood pressure, contrary to the physician's orders. There were also instances where the concentration of bags used was not documented, and when the resident's weight exceeded 216 pounds, there was no evidence that staff contacted the dialysis clinic for further instructions. Interviews with staff and the DON confirmed that the orders were not always followed and that documentation of required communications with the dialysis clinic was lacking.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙