Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0882
F

Failure to Designate Qualified Infection Preventionist and Complete Infection Surveillance

Sullivan, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse, other than the Director of Nursing (DON), to oversee the infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship programs. Record review showed that antibiotic tracking and infection surveillance were not completed for a seven-month period. During an interview, the DON stated she began working at the facility in December 2024 and was solely responsible for infection tracking, TB testing, surveillance, and the antibiotic stewardship program. She acknowledged she was unaware that the DON could not serve as the IP nurse and that an additional nurse with infection preventionist training was required for the role. Facility documentation indicated that both a full-time DON and a full-time IP nurse were designated, but in practice, only the DON was fulfilling these responsibilities. Policies provided by the administrator outlined that the IP nurse or designated infection control personnel should conduct ongoing surveillance, gather and interpret infection data, and coordinate the infection prevention program. However, these duties were not being carried out as required, as evidenced by the lack of infection surveillance and antibiotic tracking during the specified period. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 38 residents in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙