Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident with Cognitive and Physical Impairments

Greenwood, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, who was also severely cognitively impaired and at risk for falls, was repeatedly observed without access to their call light. On two separate occasions, the resident was found either in bed or in a wheelchair with the call light cord and mechanism hanging from the wall and resting near the floor, approximately three feet away from the head of the bed and not within the resident's reach. The resident was unaware of the call light's location during both observations. Interviews with facility staff, including a scheduler and a unit manager, confirmed that the call light was supposed to be kept within reach of the resident, but noted that the resident sometimes tossed the call light away. The facility administrator stated there was no specific call light policy, but that the practice was for staff to ensure call lights were accessible to residents. Despite these expectations, the resident's call light was not made accessible, resulting in a failure to reasonably accommodate the resident's needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙