Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Address Resident's Bed Height Preference in Care Plan

Indianapolis, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan that addressed all of a resident's needs, specifically the resident's preference to keep the bed in a high position despite being at high risk for falls. Observations showed the resident resting in bed with the bed in the highest position on multiple occasions, with the bed control device within reach and no staff present. The resident, who had diagnoses including vascular dementia and right-sided hemiplegia/hemiparesis following a stroke, was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and at high risk for falls. The care plan in place addressed fall risk related to right-sided deficits but did not address the resident's expressed preference for bed height. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident had been educated about the safety concerns of keeping the bed elevated but continued to adjust it to the highest position. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the clinical record lacked a care plan addressing this specific preference. Facility policy required comprehensive care plans to be reviewed and updated based on changes in the resident's condition or newly developed issues, but this was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙