Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Uphold Resident Dignity and Timely Response to Call Lights

Richmond, Indiana Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to uphold residents' rights to dignity and timely assistance, as evidenced by multiple incidents involving delayed responses to call lights and inadequate support with activities of daily living (ADLs). One resident, with a history of right lower leg fracture and muscle weakness, was left on a bedpan for over thirty minutes without assistance, despite using the call light and having a care plan that required prompt response to requests for help. The resident's family member had to seek staff assistance directly at the nurses' station, where a nurse indicated that aides were busy with meal trays and would assist after completing those duties. The same resident was also pressured to sign a refusal for a bath when she only wished to delay it due to fatigue from therapy, rather than refuse it entirely. Another resident, with a history of stroke and respiratory failure, reported waiting up to an hour for assistance to use the bathroom, resulting in urinary incontinence. This resident, who was cognitively aware and required standby assistance for toileting, described feeling humiliated by these delays. A third resident, dependent on staff for toileting due to weakness and age-related debility, reported that call lights were not answered in a timely manner, particularly during the third shift, leading to episodes of incontinence that left pajamas, sheets, and blankets soaked with urine. This resident also experienced staff refusal to assist with transferring to a recliner and to warm up cold food, despite repeated requests. A fourth resident, with diagnoses including spinal stenosis and chronic kidney disease, described waiting up to 45 minutes for call light responses, resulting in both urinary and bowel incontinence. This resident, who was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with toileting, had not reported the issue due to sympathy for the understaffed facility. Facility policies reviewed indicated that all staff were responsible for responding to call lights and that residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. The DON confirmed that the expectation was for call lights to be answered within five minutes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙