Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Appropriate Urinary Catheter Care

Greensburg, Indiana Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, including end-stage renal disease and Alzheimer's disease, was not provided with appropriate urinary catheter care. After a nurse inserted a 16 French indwelling urinary catheter, there was no urine return observed. Despite this, the clinical record did not show that the catheter placement was reassessed prior to the discovery of blood in the catheter tubing and bag. The facility's policy required that the catheter be inserted until urine flow was observed and not to force entry if resistance was met. Later, a medical assistant reported the presence of bright red blood in the resident's catheter bag, prompting emergency transport to the hospital. Imaging at the hospital revealed that the catheter balloon had been inflated within the penile urethra, rather than the bladder. The lack of documentation regarding reassessment of catheter placement after the absence of urine return contributed to the deficiency in providing appropriate catheter care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙