Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
E

Failure to Implement and Maintain Fall Prevention Interventions

Indianapolis, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement and maintain fall prevention interventions as outlined in the care plans for three residents with a history of falls. One resident, with repeated falls and fractures, was observed multiple times without a reacher or accessible storage pouch, despite care plan interventions requiring these items to prevent her from leaning forward and falling. She was also left unattended in the dining room, contrary to her care plan, and her wheelchair and bed alarms were installed without documented comprehensive fall risk assessment, education, or informed consent. Another resident, diagnosed with dementia and psychosis, was found to have a regular mattress on his bed instead of the perimeter mattress with bolsters that was ordered as a fall intervention after a previous fall. Observations confirmed the absence of the required mattress, despite its inclusion in the care plan following an interdisciplinary team review. A third resident, with diabetes, weakness, and repeated falls, was found with her call light on the floor and her bed alarm pad unplugged, rendering the alarm nonfunctional. The care plan required the use of a bed alarm and education on call light use, but these interventions were not in place at the time of observation. Facility policies required comprehensive assessment, consideration of alternatives, and informed consent for alarm use, but documentation of these steps was lacking.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙