Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Provide Timely Admission Contracts to Residents

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide admission contract/agreement packets in a timely manner to five residents, as evidenced by observations, interviews, and record reviews. One resident, who had been living in the facility for over two years and had an intact cognitive status, reported only recently being asked to sign a contract for services. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the process, noting that the contract contained blank areas, missing pages, and insufficient time was given for review. The resident also described being called to a meeting by the administrator, who accused him of discouraging others from signing the contract, which the resident denied. The resident was concerned that the contract could alter his living arrangements and expressed reluctance to sign it. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility was three years behind in providing admission contracts to residents already in the facility, prompting the hiring of a consultant to address the issue. The Director of Social Services acknowledged that the admission contract, which outlines policies, regulations, resident rights, and payment terms, should be provided at the time of admission. An audit conducted by the administrator revealed that several residents had not been offered admission contracts, with most affected residents lacking these documents for over a year after admission. The facility's admission policy, dated January 2025, did not include procedures for providing the admission packet or contract during or at the time of admission.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙